Legal Opinion

Springer v. Orr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 8, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Assmnpsit, for commissions. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant contends, first, there could be no recovery under the evidence on the common counts; second, that the court admitted improper and incompetent evidence; third, that there could be no recovery because one Weber, who brought about the execution of the contract .between appellant and Malcolm was not at the time a licensed broker; fourth, that there could be no recovery because the exchange was not completed; and fifth, that the ■ court erred in its rulings on instructions.

As to the first contention, it is sufficient to say…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Pratt v. HotchkissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
  3. Combs v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Swigart v. HawleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Munson v. FarwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roche v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. State v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Wenks v. HazardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Gilbert v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API