Legal Opinion
Ex parte Pharr
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1920Published
1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.
(orally). This action is in habeas corpus. It .is charged that the sheriff of Hamilton county, Ohio, unlawfully restrains Frank Pharr of his liberty.
In habeas corpus.
The sheriff has filed an answer alleging his election and qualification as sheriff, and states that he holds the petitioner by virtue of a sentence of the court of common pleas of Hlamilton county, wherein it was ordered that the petitioner be imprisoned in the Ohio State Reformatory at Mansfield, Ohio, for an indeterminate period,
*466This court heard evidence. It appears that the petitioner was indicted by the grand jury of Hamilton…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Baker v. GriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Tinsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.