Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Missouri v. Bruce Pierce

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 24, 2014No. SC93321Published

1Dissent

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

I respectfully dissent from the principal opinion in that I believe the trial court did not err in refusing to give the instruction for the lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree. All of the evidence at trial suggested that Denford Jackson (hereinafter, “Jackson”) carried and used a gun when he committed the robbery. There was no evidence supporting the instruction for second degree robbery. Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court’s judgment.

A trial court is “obligated to instruct the jury with respect to a particular included offense only if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. State v. DerenzySupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. HiblerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. State v. PondSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API