Legal Opinion

Moxley v. Kinloch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Practice in superior court. Waiver. Before Judge Hines. Jefferson superior court. May term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Kinloch, as plaintiff, had a verdict against Moxley, as defendant. On the last day of the term, a motion for a new trial was made by the defendant. A consent order was passed by the court reciting that there was not time to prepare a brief of the evidence, and granting sixty days within which to file the brief. A few days after the sixty days allowed for that purpose had expired, a brief of the evidence was sent by counsel for the movant to counsel for the respondent, the latter residing or being at the county site at which the cause had been tried. The brief had upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Pease v. PeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  3. Arnold v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Cothran v. BrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Usry v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hilt v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Garraux v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Connor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Mayor of Brunswick v. DavenportSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API