Legal Opinion

People v. Escarcega

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1986No. B004487PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DANIELSON, J.

Defendant Raul Escarcega appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial of violating Penal Code sections 1 209 (kidnapping for robbery) and 211 robbery. 2

- Defendant asserts that: (1) he was denied his right to a speedy trial under section 1382; and (2) he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Fosselman (1983) 33 Cal.3d 572 [189 Cal.Rptr. 855, 659 P.2d 1144]).

From our review of the record we agree that defendant was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial but find that he was not prejudiced. We also conclude that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Greenberger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. Superior Court (Alexander)California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Arroyo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. Superior Court (Alexander)California Court of Appeal · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API