Mott v. Rowland
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Bill to foreclose two mortgages. Defendant Henry C. Rowland appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is a bill to foreclose two mortgages given by Henry C. Rowland and Delilah Rowland, his wife, to complainant, upon a farm in Kalamazoo county. One of the mortgages is dated October 20, 1870, and is for the sum of $3,000, and the other is dated November 25, 1879, and is for the sum of $1,500. The first named was drawn at 10 per cent., and the other at 8 per cent., but by an agreement dated at Phelps, N. Y., August 5, 1879, time was extended on the first named mortgage for five years from April 1, 1879, the interest to be computed at 8 per cent. No defense was offered to the second…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. RobertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Miller v. TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Arnold v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Newman v. KershawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Peck v. Mayo, Follett & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1842
3Cited by7 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Green v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Crawford v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Davis v. TandyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Barras v. YoungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.