Legal Opinion

Cohan v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks to vacate an order issued by respondent which granted an application to petitioner’s former spouse to change the surname of their son.

Although a father has a recognized interest in having his child bear his surname (see, e.g., Matter of Yessner, 61 Misc 2d 174; Matter of Hinrichs v Beinecke, 41 Misc 2d 422; Steinbach v Steinbach, 119 NYS2d 708; cf. Matter of “Shipley”, 26 Misc 2d 204), neither parent has a superior right to determine the surname of the child, and the question is always whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re ShipleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In re YessnerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
  3. Hinrichs v. BeineckeNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re EberhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Rio v. RioNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Hamman v. County Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. In re SakarisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API