Seemuller v. Thornton

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

is conceded that appellants were entitled to recover the land in controversy, unless appellee Thornton had acquired title through adverse possession.

Ho question is made as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show facts necessary to the acquisition of title to land under the five years statute of limitation.

It is claimed, however, that the court erred in admitting in evidence a tax deed under which appellee claims, and admitting some tax receipts, as well as in a charge given. -

Appellee offered in evidence a tax deed under which he claimed, executed by the tax…