Legal Opinion

Dorer v. Moody

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1931No. 2665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

An interference was declared by the acting examiner between patent, No. 1586978, granted to Dorer June 1, 1926, upon an application filed February 8, 1921, and the application (which appears to be a divisional application of a parent case, the latter of which ripened into patent, No. 1502865, July 29, 1924), filed June 15, 1923, but relating back to the parent application filed August 21, 1920. By virtue of this latter date Moody became the senior party.

The counts of this interference are two in number as follows:

1. In combination with a casing- having- suction and discharge means, a rotary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leonard v. EverettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  2. Harbridge v. PerrinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Derby v. WhitworthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API