Legal Opinion

Edison Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1973No. Appeal, No. 496 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

A “semi-interpretative dancer”1 was stripped of Workmen’s Compensation Benefits by the Referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversed, resulting in the instant Appeal.

Patricia Bock (Claimant) was employed by the Edison Hotel (Hotel) to entertain the public in what she described in her professional parlance as “semi-interpretative dancing.” On January 13, 1971, while doing her last number, Claimant avers that she slipped on the stage and twisted her right ankle, saving herself from a fall by virtue of an alert grasp of the curtain behind. She…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Arnold Coal & Supply Co. v. MarkleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Bayuk Cigar Co. v. HawnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tioga Textiles Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. L & A Products v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API