Legal Opinion

Fishoff Family Foundation v. Frydman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 2017No. 653838/14 3525 3524PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered October 22, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Insofar as relevant here, to be liable for sanctions, a party or attorney must knowingly submit or sign pleadings or papers containing materially false statements of fact (Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1 et seq.). Whether to impose sanctions, even in such a case, is left to the discretion of the court (see e.g. Weisburst v Dreifus, 89 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2011]). Here, plaintiffs stated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weisburst v. DreifusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gowen v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API