Legal Opinion

Watson-Higgins Milling Co. v. PERE MARQUETTE RAILWAY CO.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1950No. Docket 2, Calendar 44,552PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff is engaged in the flour-milling business at Grand Rapids, and the defendant is a railroad common carrier. In May, 1944, plaintiff requested the defendant to spot a box car on plaintiff’s .siding, in which to ship flour. On May 24th the car was spotted at plaintiff’s loading dock and on the .same date examined for leaks and loaded with 900 100-pound sacks of flour. Uniform bill of lading was issued May 25th by the defendant company for shipment of the flour to a delivery point in Pennsylvania. ■Government inspectors there condemned the ship…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas Canning Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MarcellettiMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rockwell v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hecker Products Corp. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lyons v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Noble v. Roadway Express, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lewis v. ZukermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API