Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1938No. 27202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff, Texas Company, brought this action against defendant, Ok lahoma Tax Oommission, to recover sales taxes with interest, which taxes had been paid under protest. Plaintiff: set forth eight causes of action, same being numbered (a) to (li), inclusive. Prior to the trial, its cause of action numbered (a) was dismissed and is not now before usf Judgment was rendered for plaintiff on each of its causes of action, and the Tax Oommission has appealed to this court.

No dispute exists as to the facts, and this court is presented only with the questions of law involved, which questions concern…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. Arkansas Utilities CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Muskogee Wholesale Grocer Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Texas Hide & Leather Co. v. BondsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Hood Rubber Products Co. v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. PrietoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Oklahoma City v. BrientSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Waterford Energy, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Waldrep v. MosesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Opinion No. 76-123 (1976) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API