Legal Opinion

Mills v. Quick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 28, 1959No. 37602PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

Chapter 110-4 of the Georgia Code of 1933, “Judgment by Default”, was comprehensively revised by §§ 18-23 of the New Practice Act (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 777-779) and subsequent amendments. The first question for decision is whether the revised provisions relating to> judgments by default are applicable to cases in the City Court of Albany. Section 25 of the New Practice Act (Ga. L. 1946, p. 780) provides, “The provisions of this section of these rules shall apply to all suits in the superior courts of the State except those proceedings specifically excepted in Paragraph 24…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Grogan v. DeraneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Schofield's Sons Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Globe Motors, Inc. v. NoonanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. HOMASOTE COMPANY v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Stamps Tire Company, Inc. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. GianotosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API