Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gratney ex rel. Gratney v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1922No. 22,668; No. 22,142; No. 22,143Published

Appeals from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.

1DissentMarshall, J.

This action is prosecuted under section 722 of the General Statutes of 1915. That,section reads:

“Any person who shall without contributing negligence on his part sustain damage by reason of any defective bridge, culvert, or highway, may recover such damage from the county or township wherein such defective bridge, culvert or highway is located, as hereinafter provided; that is to say, such recovery may be from the county when such damage was caused by a defective bridge constructed wholly or partially by such county, and when the chairman of the board of county commissioners of such county…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Reading Township v. TelferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Board of Commissioners v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Silver v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API