Legal Opinion · Dissent

Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1970Published

1Dissent

Steuer,, J. (dissenting).

The facts are virtually undisputed, nor is there any serious question of law. The difficulty lies in the application of the law to these facts.

The defendant in 1965 was awarded a contract by the United States Navy for the manufacture of a number of radar sets. The sets contained almost a thousand different parts, and the defendant subcontracted the manufacture of several of these among various manufacturers. The plaintiff was awarded one of these subcontracts involving 40 different parts. Needless to remark, this was in the period of the Vietnam hostilities, and *393comple…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. . Rector, Etc., Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Clasen v. DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Gallagher Switchboard Corp. v. Heckler Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Underhill Construction Corp. v. CiraldoNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API