Legal Opinion
Norcross v. Nathan
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 23, 1900No. 906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On demurrer to complaint*
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This action is instituted by the plaintiff, as trustee of M. Nathan, a bankrupt, to recover certain personal property from the defendant Hausmann, alleged to have been fraudulently obtained by him for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of Nathan; and for the purpose of setting aside a mortgage fraudulently given to defendant L. J. Cohn by M. Nathan. The facts with reference to these transactions, as alleged in the complaint, are substantially the same as were presented to this court in the petition for an injunction against L. J. Cohn. In re Nathan (D. C.) 92 Fed.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore Mfg. Co. v. BillingsOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Hoskins v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Johnson v. Hanley, Hoye Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1911
- Hall v. KincellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900