Legal Opinion
Dr. Harry Kaplan v. Samuel Hirsh
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1982No. 81-1789PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:
Kaplan obtained a judgment against Hirsh in the district court for the District of Columbia. Hirsh filed a timely notice of appeal but did not file a supersedeas bond to stay execution on the judgment. Thereafter, Kaplan attempted to register the judgment in the district court in Maryland, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963 which permits a judgment creditor to register his judgment in foreign districts once it has become “final by appeal or expiration of time for appeal.” The Maryland district court refused to register the judgment, construing the statutory language to mean…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abegglen v. BurnhamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1950
- Slade v. DickinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1949
- John R. W. Sterling v. Leroy J. Blackwelder, James Keith and Samuel Beach, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Dorey v. DoreyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1978
- Lipton v. SchmertzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moses v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Dickey v. FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund v. Metals & Machining Fabricators, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- State Bank of Spring Hill v. Bucyrus Grain Co. (In Re Bucyrus Grain Co.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Dr. Harry Kaplan v. Samuel HirshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.