Legal Opinion

Withrow v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1924No. 2262PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Taylor Withrow and Arthur Vinson, alias Happy Riggs, were convicted on informations charging unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors and maintenance of a nuisance. The evidence on behalf of the government was as follows:

On an afternoon in June, 1923, O. C. Johnson, a motorcycle police officer of Huntington, W. Va., met the defendants and Charles Boyd driving an automobile in the suburbs of Huntington. The officer called to them to stop. In response they increased speed and dashed through the streets of the city. The officer pursued, again ordering them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ash v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  2. Hedderly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. Riggs v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  3. Garber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Malaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  5. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API