Legal Opinion

People v. Hillie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender is unpreserved for our review (see, People v Perez, 245 AD2d 143, lv denied 91 NY2d 944; see also, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v James [Adolphus], 159 AD2d 723). In any event, we conclude that defendant’s contention is without merit. Defendant contends that he did not controvert the allegations in the predicate felony statement because the People had indicated to defense counsel that they would withdraw their consent to the plea agreement if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CobaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API