Legal Opinion

Aikman v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 4, 2021No. 2:19-cv-05421Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JUSTIN M. AIKMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:19-cv-5421 Magistrate Judge Jolson COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter, in which the parties consented to the jurisdiction of the Undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (see Docs. 4, 6), is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Post-Order Motion to Reopen and Evaluate Attorney Affidavit (Doc. 22). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED, and the Court will not reopen its December 10, 2020, Opinion and Order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bryant v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Gunther v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API