McNaughton v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se; refund claim untimely under 26 U.S.C. § 6511(a); lack of jurisdiction to hear partner-level refund suits under 26 U.S.C. § 7422
OPINION AND ORDER
FIRESTONE, Judge.
In this tax refund suit, pro se plaintiffs Christopher J. McNaughton and Judith I. MeNaughton, husband and wife (collectively, “the plaintiffs” or “the McNaughtons”), seek $154,900 plus interest and unspecified penalties stemming from their 2005 and 2007 tax years. Their three-count complaint seeks tax refunds related to accumulated passive losses from several federally registered Publicly Traded Partnerships (“PTPs”).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Angelo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015