Legal Opinion

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1956No. 12898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George W. Gowins v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962