Legal Opinion

Stern, Lauer Shohl & Co. v. Marx

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from McLennan, Nineteenth District. Tried below before Hon. Marshall Surratt.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

The nature and result of the suit is correctly stated in appellant’s brief, which is as follows:

“This was an action of trespass to try title, by appellants as plaintiffs against appellees as defendants. The defendants answered by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of not guilty, and also the statute of limitations of three years and four years. They further answered that, while the action was one in the form of -trespass to try title, it was in truth and in fact one to determine a certain deed made by S. Marx to defendant Mollie Marx, as fraudulent and void.
“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martel v. SomersTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Reynolds v. LansfordTexas Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eckert v. WendelTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hawkins v. Western Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Watson v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. First Nat. Bank of Eldorado v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Hawkins v. Western Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API