Legal Opinion

People v. Raygoza

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 2016No. B262978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA,

2011, while awaiting trial, appellant John Paul Raygoza fell $105,000 short in posting the bail set by the court. The court agreed to reduce bail if appellant agreed to be confined to his home under an electronic monitoring program established by the County of Los Angeles. In 2014, after pleading no contest to a charge of false imprisonment and receiving a sentence of four years, he sought presentence custody credit under Penal Code section 2900.5, which requires courts to award such credit for all “days served in home detention pursuant to . . . Section 1203.018.” The trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. MobleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Hautman CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. YanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API