Legal Opinion
Singh v. Madhu Rest., Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 31, 2019No. 2019 NYSlipOp 50878(U)Published
1Opinion of the Court
Balvir Singh and Lakhwinder Singh, Respondents,
against
Madhu Restaurant, Inc., and John S. Desiderio, Esq., as Stakeholder only, Appellants.
Law Office of John S. Desiderio, P.C. (John S. Desiderio of counsel), for appellants. Richard G. Johnson, Esq., for respondents (no brief filed).
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Donna-Marie Golia, J.), entered August 31, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, denied the branch of defendants' motion seeking to dismiss the complaint, granted plaintiffs' cross motion to amend the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Misicki v. CaradonnaNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. v. FieroNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GambinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Smith v. Monarch Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979