Legal Opinion

Czepial v. Krohne Roofing Company

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1957PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

93 So.2d 84 (1957)

Stanley CZEPIAL, Petitioner,

v.

KROHNE ROOFING COMPANY, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

February 6, 1957.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1957.

M.S. Marlin, Miami, for petitioner.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, Burnis T. Coleman and Rodney Durrance, Tallahassee, for respondents.

ROBERTS, Justice.

The claimant, a roofer, sought workmen's compensation for a disability diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis, far advanced. The Deputy Commissioner found that, although tuberculosis is not a disease peculiar to the roofing trade,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. HARDIN'S BAKERIES v. RanagerMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Scobey v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Alexander Orr, Jr., Inc. v. Florida Industrial Comm.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. Festa v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Evans v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API