Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided August 27, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-311-3PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GEORGE ROSS ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Given the public interest in this action and in the interest of time, the Court issued an Order dated July 31, 1986, dismissing this case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court hereby issues this detailed Order providing the reasons for its decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiffs are growers of flue-cured tobacco. They brought this lawsuit as representatives of a class consisting of all producers of flue-cured tobacco in the United States who sold tobacco to the corporate defendants and who are…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Davis v. HammCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Larry Lay v. Burley Stabilization CorporatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Julian A. Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Larry Lay v. Burley Stabilization CorporatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009