Holeman v. Landmark Chevrolet Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellants, Richard Holeman, E.W. Ches-shire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, Dan Frank-houser, Eugene Yates, and L.T. Bradt sued appellees, Landmark Chevrolet Corporation and Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). The trial court entered a take nothing judgment and appellants bring twelve points of error. We affirm.
Landmark Chevrolet ran an advertisement on a radio station that, among other things, stated all offers would be accepted and that new trucks would be sacrificed, “regardless of loss.” Appellants went to Landmark…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Lee v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Mitchell v. LaFlamme, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- De Leon v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Harris County v. Nagel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.