Legal Opinion

Holeman v. Landmark Chevrolet Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 28, 1999No. 14-96-227-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellants, Richard Holeman, E.W. Ches-shire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, Dan Frank-houser, Eugene Yates, and L.T. Bradt sued appellees, Landmark Chevrolet Corporation and Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). The trial court entered a take nothing judgment and appellants bring twelve points of error. We affirm.

Landmark Chevrolet ran an advertisement on a radio station that, among other things, stated all offers would be accepted and that new trucks would be sacrificed, “regardless of loss.” Appellants went to Landmark…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Lee v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Mitchell v. LaFlamme, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. De Leon v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  5. Harris County v. Nagel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API