Legal Opinion

Howard v. Sharpe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1996No. S96A0125PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

We granted Edgar Howard’s pro se application for a certificate of probable cause to examine the propriety of the sanctions imposed upon him by the habeas court following the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. Based on our conclusion that the sanctions were appropriate, we affirm.

Howard, an inmate, filed a petition for habeas corpus and other pleadings in the Superior Court of Macon County. 1 The habeas court determined that Howard’s petition contained no cognizable claims and upon motion by Warden Sharpe, assessed attorney fees and costs against Howard pursuant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Giles v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ramos v. TerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Smith v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. In Re Lawsuits of CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Denardo v. CutlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API