Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 1991No. Nos. 1151, 1197 and 1187; Dockets 90-7785, 90-7943 and 90-7945Published

1Dissent

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,

dissenting in part:

The question raised by this case is how far New York courts will go in imposing liability on manufacturers for their failure to anticipate misuses of their products. Since I do not believe that New York courts would go as far as the majority has gone in obliging manufacturers to pay for customers’ self-inflicted damages, I respectfully dissent from the Court’s judgment insofar as it remands the plaintiff's claim against Honeywell, Inc. for trial.

Honeywell manufactured a “heating unit” for a water heater fueled by liquid propane. During the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Knickerbocker v. De MarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Kehn v. Cooley Volkswagen Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API