City of Toledo v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSinger, J.
Introduction
{¶ 1} Appellants, the state of Ohio and Attorney General Michael DeWine, appeal from the July 10, 2018 judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, where summary judgment was granted to appellee, the city of Toledo. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, and reverse in part.
Assignments of Error
1. The trial court erred in holding that portions of Amended Senate Bill 342 ("the State Traffic Camera Law") are unconstitutional when those provisions do not directly injure the City and the City does not have standing to challenge them. (Opinion and Judgment Entry "JE").
2.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Downey v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020