Kessler v. Perrong
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 212, Oct. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1900, No. 362, on verdict for defendant in case of Julius Kessler & Company v. John Perrong. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Before Bechtel, P. J. At the trial it appeared that on April 18, 1900, defendant purchased from Sidney Hirsh, a salesman of the plaintiff, five barrels of whisky, on the following contract: “Sale slip.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 212, Oct. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1900, No. 362, on verdict for defendant in case of Julius Kessler & Company v. John Perrong. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Before Bechtel, P. J. At the trial it appeared that on April 18, 1900, defendant purchased from Sidney Hirsh, a salesman of the plaintiff, five barrels of whisky, on the following contract: “Sale slip. Girardville, April 19,1900. Julius Kessler & Co., Inc., World Building, New York. Gentlemen: I have this day bought of you through your Mr. Hirsh five barrel whisky in…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
The agent of the plaintiff, on April 19, 1900, entered into an agreement with the defendant for the sale of five barrels of whisky. The defendant made and delivered five notes, payable to the order of the plaintiffs, for the price of the whisky. The whisky was stored in a United States bonded warehouse, in Bourbon county, Kentucky. A warehouse receipt which properly identified the five several packages, and which upon its face appeared to be negotiable, was delivered to the defendant. The defendant shortly afterwards paid one of the notes and the internal revenue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leaming v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Howard v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Shisler v. VandikeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Mann v. SalsbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Acetylene Light, Heat & Power Co. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Russ Soda Fountain Co. v. Victor Pastry Shoppe, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Automobile Securities Co. v. ScungioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Monticello Distilling Co. v. DannenhauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- United States v. Dewart Milk Products Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1924