Legal Opinion

Baynor v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 31, 1999No. 145, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The petitioner, Gary Baynor (Baynor), here seeks reversal of his conviction for murder and other offenses, contending that the State failed to furnish discoverable information concerning Baynor’s confession and that the trial court abused its discretion in circumscribing, both at the suppression hearing and at Baynor’s jury trial, the defense examination of the detectives who obtained the confession.1

*730On the evening of February 1, 1996, Dion Williams (Williams) and Marvin Nock (Nock) were shot while standing at the 3300 block of Edgewood Street in Baltimore City. Williams was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API