State v. Vargas
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentWechsler, Judge
{35} I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I agree with the majority that announcement is preferable. I also agree with the majority’s discussion of the history, importance, and purpose of the knock-and-announce rule, but I conclude that the ultimate test, reasonableness, was met in this case. The majority opinion appears to create a bright-line rule of announcement before officers make any entry beyond a doorway. But see, e.g., State v. Duran, 2005-NMSC-034, ¶ 34, 138 N.M. 414, 120 P.3d 836 (“Our case law has consistently disfavored a bright-line test in analyzing Fourth…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.