Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Seabolt v. State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 2019No. 2018-0695PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
*444 {¶ 1} Appellant, Benjamin R. Seabolt, appeals the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals denying his request for a writ of mandamus against appellee, the State Highway Patrol Retirement System ("HPRS" or "the board"). We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} Seabolt became a state trooper in 2007. As a trooper, Seabolt regularly wore a service belt that weighed approximately 22 to 25 pounds. According to Seabolt, the service belt, also referred to as a "utility belt" or "gun belt," included Seabolt's firearm, ammunition, handcuffs, Taser, and flashlight.
{¶ 3} Between January…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Shisler v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. American Standard, Inc. v. BoehlerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Grein v. Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Riddick v. MLS Homes, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Videkovich Farmland of Ohio, L.L.C. v. Woolever Family, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020