Legal Opinion

The Hub, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 19, 1926No. Docket Nos. 3553, 3554Published

1. Value of leasehold determined. 2. An oral assignment of a leasehold interest in real estate is voidable, and not void, and where the parties have recognized the assignment as valid, it can not be attacked by a third party.

1Opinion of the Court

APPEAL OF THE HUB, INC.

The Hub, Inc. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 3553, 3554.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

3 B.T.A. 1259; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2425;

April 19, 1926, Decided Submitted October 11, 1925.

1. Value of leasehold determined.

2. An oral assignment of a leasehold interest in real estate is voidable, and not void, and where the parties have recognized the assignment as valid, it can not be attacked by a third party.

James W. Ewing, W. D. Jamieson, and Harry Friedman, Esqs., for the taxpayer.

Robert A. Littleton, Esq., for the Commissioner

PHILLIPS

Before GRAUPNER, TRAMMELL, and PHILLIPS.

Taxpayer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Hub, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API