Legal Opinion

Security Pacific International Bank v. National Bank

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-117JPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Security Pacific International Bank is a corresponding bank for plaintiff Union Bank of Finland, a Finnish banking institution. Third-party defendant Neste Oy, a Finnish coal company, and third-party defendant Neste Coal Corporation, its United States subsidiary, use Security Pacific’s services in dealing with third-party defendant North Energy Inc., a coal broker located in Somerset, Pennsylvania, in the Western District of Pennsylvania. North Energy maintained an account with the de fendant, National Bank of Western Pennsylvania.

At…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Charles R. Peterson, in No. 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation, a Corporation, in No. 80-2663Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API