Cordero-Artigas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
Raidel Cordero-Artigas appeals his convictions and sentences for manufacture of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. See §§ 893.18(l)(a)(2), .147(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). He argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State’s evidence was insufficient to convict him. We agree and reverse.
The Sarasota County Sheriffs Office Narcotics Bureau suspected that a newly built North Port residence was a marijuana grow house. Detective Torres conducted surveillance on the house for two months. During that time, he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Jaramillo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Norton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rangel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Miranda v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013