Legal Opinion

Rose v. Minis

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 28, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 N.J. Super. 538 (1956)

125 A.2d 535

ROBERT J. ROSE AND LLOYD V.S. CONOVER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

H. PHILIP MINIS AND DOROTHEA H. MINIS, AND MAX ZAITZ AND DAVID ZAITZ, PARTNERS, T/A B. ZAITZ & SONS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 17, 1956.

Decided September 28, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Francis P. Sutton argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Hauck, Herrigel & Sutton, attorneys).

Mr. James S. Turp argued the cause for the defendants-respondents Max Zaitz and David Zaitz, partners, t/a B. Zaitz &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Davis v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Lindley v. KeimSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Ettinger v. LouxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Flash v. DillonUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barry Norman Agency, Inc. v. EliasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Guber v. PetersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Thompson Realty Co. v. HoaglandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Potts v. ThompsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Beall v. BeallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API