People v. Tejeda
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The proof was sufficient to establish physical injury by "impairment of physical condition” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]). The complainant testified that defendant hit him on the forehead with the barrel of a pistol, causing a wound that bled profusely; photographs taken two weeks later were in evi*938dence, showing a red, wishbone-shaped scar about one-half inch in diameter over the complainant’s right eye; and a scar was still visible at the time of trial more than four months later. We reject defendant’s contention…
2Cited by29 opinions
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KrutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.