Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Akridge

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1980No. 936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Rocky Akridge, appellant, was convicted non-jury of resisting arrest, indecent assault, and simple assault. Post-trial motions were denied and consecutive sentences of probation were imposed. On appeal, he argues that his motion in arrest of judgment should have been granted because he was not brought to trial within 180 days as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. More specifically, appellant avers that two extensions of time granted by the court were improper because the Commonwealth failed to show that it had exercised due diligence in commencing trial. Because we are unable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. AntonuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MullinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. WrotenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. PurnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API