Commonwealth v. Tamme
Kentucky Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKeller, Justice
I agree with the majority that the trial court erred when it vacated Appellee’s convictions and sentences of death and granted Appellee a new trial. As to Ap-pellee’s contention that he was entitled to a new trial because of a newly-discovered impeachment witness, I agree with the analysis in Part II of the majority opinion. *471With respect to Appellee’s argument that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel misinterpreted this Court’s opinion1 on appeal from his first trial, however, I cannot agree with the majority’s Part I conclusion that Ap-pellee’s trial counsel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haight v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Holland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.