Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Tamme

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2002No. 2000-SC-0784-MRPublished

1ConcurrenceKeller, Justice

I agree with the majority that the trial court erred when it vacated Appellee’s convictions and sentences of death and granted Appellee a new trial. As to Ap-pellee’s contention that he was entitled to a new trial because of a newly-discovered impeachment witness, I agree with the analysis in Part II of the majority opinion. *471With respect to Appellee’s argument that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel misinterpreted this Court’s opinion1 on appeal from his first trial, however, I cannot agree with the majority’s Part I conclusion that Ap-pellee’s trial counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haight v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Holland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API