Guckenberger v. Dexter
Hamilton Circuit Court
1Opinion of the CourtSwing, J.
By direction of the Supreme Court the question as to -allowance to the taxpayer for his costs and a reasonable compensation to his attorneys under sec. 1779, Rev. Stat., in this case has b'een left to this court.
We have been asked to allow as compensation to plaintiff’s attorneys the sum of $25,000.
We have received testimony from quite a number of lawyers in large and active practice as to the value of the services rendered, the amounts ranging from $3,000 to $25,000.
The question involved in the litigation is recognized by every one as being of very great importance to the city, and as a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hess v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000