Legal Opinion

Guckenberger v. Dexter

Hamilton Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSwing, J.

By direction of the Supreme Court the question as to -allowance to the taxpayer for his costs and a reasonable compensation to his attorneys under sec. 1779, Rev. Stat., in this case has b'een left to this court.

We have been asked to allow as compensation to plaintiff’s attorneys the sum of $25,000.

We have received testimony from quite a number of lawyers in large and active practice as to the value of the services rendered, the amounts ranging from $3,000 to $25,000.

The question involved in the litigation is recognized by every one as being of very great importance to the city, and as a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hess v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API