FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. FragranceX.Com, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BIANCO, District Judge.
Plaintiff FragranceNet.com seeks leave to file a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) to add state and federal claims based on FragranceX.com, Inc.’s (“defendant”) alleged misuse of plaintiffs trademark (1) as a keyword to prompt defendant’s appearance as a sponsored link in Google’s search engine and (2) by inclusion of plaintiffs trademark in defendant’s website metatags. Defendant opposes the amendment on futility grounds, arguing that the allegations cannot survive a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FragranceNet. Com, Inc. v. FragranceX. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007