In re David O.C. St. Vincent's Services, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the mother’s contention, the agency established by clear and convincing evidence that she permanently neglected her child by failing to plan for his future for a period of more than one year following the date he came into the agency’s care (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [c]). At a minimum, plan*776ning for the future of the child requires the parent to take steps to correct the conditions that led to the child’s removal from the home (see Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 840 [1986]; Matter of Tynell S., 43 AD3d 1171, 1172 [2007]; Matter of Jennifer R., 29 AD3d 1005, 1006…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of NathanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re Jeremiah Kwimea T. Pius Xii Youth & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Jennifer R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re HarlemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re "Baby Boy" E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re Jonathan B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Christopher T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Jamel Raheem B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Aaliyah L. C. (Jamie A.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Tanay R.S. (Tanya M.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.