Blue Durham Props., L. L.C. v. Krantz (In re Russo)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO'Connor, C.J.
*1201{¶ 1} Stephen P. Hanudel, counsel for the defendants, has filed an affidavit and a supplemental affidavit with the clerk of this court pursuant to R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Nancy Margaret Russo from presiding over any further proceedings in the above-referenced case.
{¶ 2} Mr. Hanudel avers that Judge Russo is biased against him and his clients and should be disqualified from deciding his pending motion to vacate the sanctions that she previously imposed on him. Judge Russo has responded in writing and denies exhibiting any bias against Mr. Hanudel or the defendants.
{¶ 3} "The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- In re Disqualification of CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShimkoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Blue Durham Properties, L.L.C. v. KrantzOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2014
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blue Durham Properties v. KrantzOhio Court of Appeals · 2019