Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fulkerson v. Murdock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1893Published

Appeal from the St. Charles Circuit Court. — Hon. W. W. Edward's, Judge.

1DissentBond, J.

(dissenting). — I have thoroughly examined the record in this cause on the motion for rehearing, and the only conclusion, in my mind, to be drawn therefrom is that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed under conceded principles of law.

The only point upon which this case was reversed, as shown in the opinion of the majority of the court, was the assumed error of the trial court in permitting the plaintiff to introduce witnesses in support of his “general reputation for honesty and truthfulness.” I *160do not think the admission of this testimony was error; on the contrary I do not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Muller v. St. Louis Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. State v. BreedenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Spaunhorst v. LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API