Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMahon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 2002No. A02A1261Published

1DissentRuffin, Presiding Judge

I agree with the majority that Francis McMahon acted criminally in obtaining money from a bank for a construction loan while simultaneously receiving cash from the Morgans. However, I disagree that McMahon was guilty of theft by taking from the Morgans, the only offense for which he was convicted. Accordingly, I must respectfully dissent.

McMahon was charged under OCGA § 16-8-2, which provides that “[a] person commits the offense of theft by taking when he unlawfully takes or, being in lawful possession thereof, unlawfully *518appropriates any property of another with the intention of depriving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Spray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Elder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Mullen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API