Legal Opinion

Markham v. Hunnicutt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Estoppel. Decrees. Before Judge Hopkins. Eulton Superior Court. April Term, 1871. Hunnicutt’s bill against Marcellus O. Markham, averred as follows: On the 19th of July, 1866, Markham’s father sold one Sells certain land in Atlanta, on credit, for $10,000, for which Sells gave his two notes for $5,000 00, each, payable to M. O. Markham, and secured by mortgage on the land.

Read the full summary

Estoppel. Decrees. Before Judge Hopkins. Eulton Superior Court. April Term, 1871. Hunnicutt’s bill against Marcellus O. Markham, averred as follows: On the 19th of July, 1866, Markham’s father sold one Sells certain land in Atlanta, on credit, for $10,000, for which Sells gave his two notes for $5,000 00, each, payable to M. O. Markham, and secured by mortgage on the land. Sells paid the first note by a resale of half the lot to M. O. Markham, and the lien on that half was extinguished. In September, 1866, Sells sub-divided the other half into four parts, and sold them at public outcry to the…

1Opinion of the Court

Warner, Judge.

This was a bill filed by the complainant against the defendant, praying for an injunction to restrain the defendant from selling a certain described city lot, it the city of Atlanta, by virtue of a mortgage fi. fa. in favor of the defendant, as mortgagee, against one Holmes Sells. It appears from the evidence in the record, that Sells executed a mortgage to the defendant, for the lot in controversy, on the 19th day of July, 1866, which was duly recorded on the 20th day of July, 1866; that afterwards, an agreement was entered into between the defendant and Sells, the mortgagor,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peppers v. PeppersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API